Pledging Allegiance To The Socialist Lincoln State
The Pledge of Allegiance is not the work of the founding fathers according to Dr DiLorenzo the pledge did not come about untill 1892 it was authorized by Francis Bellamy a defrocked Baptist Minister. Bellamy was an Christian Socialist and was removed from the pulpit for preaching politics or the Socialist view of Christ and espousing his views in church. Christ was an revolutionary for Israel,contends Bellamy Jesus protecting Israel toward the process,of Roman Fascism. Whereas his cousin Edward Bellamy Author of the popular 1888 Socialist fantasy looking backward the novel is about the main character Julian West who falls asleep in 1887 and awakens in the year 2000 when Socialist Utopia is brought about all industry is state owned soviet style every one is drafted into the military at age 21.and also becomes an employee of the state.
Therefore,for example the Lincoln administration socialist policey durining the American civil war was advocating parts of Christain Socialism such as Income taxzation, and central banking under federal control and what is interesting Nationializing education.Rousseau was one of the founders of modern Nationialism and Lincoln followed with totalitarian commusim.Francis Bellamy has said that there is one purpose of the Pledge was to help achieve this totalitarian fantasy in the United States of America.
The Pledge of Allegiance was authorized in the late 19th century by a socialist who designed it as an politicial tool with the concept of brain washing children in the supposed values of the monopolistic consolidated of our schools into the fine process of Socialism.Therefore the Lincoln administration view of GENERAL WILL inspired by Rousseau a fore front to Utopian Socialism,whereas by saying LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
However the American version of the French Revolution was imposing an idealism of nationialism on many nations and lands ,if one would disagree with the state in general they may be free if it eventually kills them in the process.Professor Claes Run states how Rousseaus and the Bellamy cousins philosphy of government COLLIDES with advocates of consititutionialism such as the America founding Fathers who were libertarin and not Socialist at all.Frances Bellamy claimed that the loyalty oaths of the Pledge of Allegiance, were based on oaths of the Southern military who were forced to surrender with General Robert Lee.
This concept was started by the Lincoln administrations attitude of state sucessionof Southern Nationialism and southern nation states trading with europe fine tabacco and cotton.Therefore this was the souths goal income and indepents towards the federal union of the United States However that was not to be by President Lincoln and his concept of Nationial Socialism turning the United states into one country by the people for the people.Futhermore Lincoln did not care about libertarinism and like his party members what I call Republican Marxist,wanted the South to be rural and farmland to the imperial North.
ONE NATION INDIVISIBLE If states rights or the concept of being indepented then Socialism Utopia as Ive said by the founding fathers would not be allowed this is why they lived and fought for the United states freedom from Great Britian and SOCIALISM would never become at all.The public schools were eager to promote this new social indoctrism by taking attendence in government runned schools.In reason not the work of our Founding Fathers who would turn in their graves.
Knowing the concept of Socialism or any civil war would exist states DR DiLorenzo the United States would be advocates of the rights of States written by the founding fathers that would coexist with each other.Yes as some say Lincoln introduced NAZISM to the American scene by declaring war on the South encouraging Indian and Southern, genocide,which he gave orders for General Shermans death marches throughout the deep South.
Although Lincoln had communications with Karl Marx supporting unions in the German community,it may be a good thing at that but I feel an Lincoln who is admired by most communist countries such as Red china and Vietnam nationialist as a great leader who stop Southern secession.
Therefore,for example the Lincoln administration socialist policey durining the American civil war was advocating parts of Christain Socialism such as Income taxzation, and central banking under federal control and what is interesting Nationializing education.Rousseau was one of the founders of modern Nationialism and Lincoln followed with totalitarian commusim.Francis Bellamy has said that there is one purpose of the Pledge was to help achieve this totalitarian fantasy in the United States of America.
The Pledge of Allegiance was authorized in the late 19th century by a socialist who designed it as an politicial tool with the concept of brain washing children in the supposed values of the monopolistic consolidated of our schools into the fine process of Socialism.Therefore the Lincoln administration view of GENERAL WILL inspired by Rousseau a fore front to Utopian Socialism,whereas by saying LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
However the American version of the French Revolution was imposing an idealism of nationialism on many nations and lands ,if one would disagree with the state in general they may be free if it eventually kills them in the process.Professor Claes Run states how Rousseaus and the Bellamy cousins philosphy of government COLLIDES with advocates of consititutionialism such as the America founding Fathers who were libertarin and not Socialist at all.Frances Bellamy claimed that the loyalty oaths of the Pledge of Allegiance, were based on oaths of the Southern military who were forced to surrender with General Robert Lee.
This concept was started by the Lincoln administrations attitude of state sucessionof Southern Nationialism and southern nation states trading with europe fine tabacco and cotton.Therefore this was the souths goal income and indepents towards the federal union of the United States However that was not to be by President Lincoln and his concept of Nationial Socialism turning the United states into one country by the people for the people.Futhermore Lincoln did not care about libertarinism and like his party members what I call Republican Marxist,wanted the South to be rural and farmland to the imperial North.
ONE NATION INDIVISIBLE If states rights or the concept of being indepented then Socialism Utopia as Ive said by the founding fathers would not be allowed this is why they lived and fought for the United states freedom from Great Britian and SOCIALISM would never become at all.The public schools were eager to promote this new social indoctrism by taking attendence in government runned schools.In reason not the work of our Founding Fathers who would turn in their graves.
Knowing the concept of Socialism or any civil war would exist states DR DiLorenzo the United States would be advocates of the rights of States written by the founding fathers that would coexist with each other.Yes as some say Lincoln introduced NAZISM to the American scene by declaring war on the South encouraging Indian and Southern, genocide,which he gave orders for General Shermans death marches throughout the deep South.
Although Lincoln had communications with Karl Marx supporting unions in the German community,it may be a good thing at that but I feel an Lincoln who is admired by most communist countries such as Red china and Vietnam nationialist as a great leader who stop Southern secession.
Source...