The New World Order as it is being portrayed in the mainstream media for a long time is not a theory anymore.
We have heard about it as a conspiracy theory in the beginning.
Then we heard about it as a conspiracy.
Now we are hearing it as an unfolding reality.
Therefore it is not a theory anymore.
If we look at the history of civilization we can find out how humans evolved socially and economically to build communities.
The smaller communities turned into big civilizations eventually.
There have been additions and divisions of communities that shaped our current day world as it is.
Since the time when the rule of kings faded and the democracy started to emerge we have been facing a new kind of issue.
That issue is the power and the corruption correlating to the power.
The British Historian Lord Acton has been quoted to have said that all power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.
" This is the issue we have faced for a long time and facing right now.
How would the world become a place where power doesn't trend to corrupt? In my opinion it is not the power that corrupts but the person who has the most power leads the corruption and the people with consecutive levels of power follow in support to the first person.
If all power could be divided equally between all people involved, then the power will not corrupt.
That is because there will not be a single person with power over the others.
When there is no such thing as absolute power there will be no corruption as well.
In our current system the process we practice to allocate power is the election.
It can be a presidential election, a parliamentary election, an election for a particular house or any other entity.
What we do not have is the control over the elected personnel.
Once elected, they are free to do whatever they decide to.
This is the accumulation of power from all the people who voted in a particular election, and then using it with individual decision.
This is what I think is an absolute power.
If we had a system where the decisions of an elected person or elected people could be altered by the people who brought them to power, then the corruption will be less.
So what does New World Order has to do with this power and corruption? The answer is actually very deep but could be explained in a simple manner.
The New World Order is a term that has been depicted mostly as evil than an order.
In fact there are multiple views to this particular term.
It was in the dark a little while ago but is spoken out in the mainstream media now like never before.
Who is looking forward to having a New World Order is another issue.
The governments and business corporations looking forward to a New World Order are actually looking forward for better control system.
They want to have total control of people, processes and most importantly the money.
The financial markets are first and foremost concern in the current day news about New World Order.
Sometimes it involves military power and if you look carefully that comes with an economical background as well.
We can conclude as the current day power results from finances.
If we can bring about a system without trade, then there will be no profit and loss in terms of finances.
If there are no profits and losses, then there would be no business and therefore no finances.
If there are no finances then there will be no economy as such.
If there is no economy to control the powers, then the corruption will be less.
In order to bring about an ideal system like that, first we will have to work out a system where the opinion of every single citizen counts; not just on an election day but in all days.
So the real New World Order should be an order that brings people to power than the finances to power.
We can achieve this if, and only if we can understand this first.
Most of the public opinion is declined towards thinking that the New World Order is an evil thing.
If we can change that mindset from the people and make them understand that the term merely refers to something that is to come, then we might have a chance of setting up our own New World Order.
We can propose our own systems and we can decide which laws we want and which we don't.
It doesn't really matter which country you are from but if you look at the constitution of your country, you will agree to the fact that you do not agree to all the legislation.
If that is the case, why don't we start thinking, deciding and acting to making a New World Order?
We have heard about it as a conspiracy theory in the beginning.
Then we heard about it as a conspiracy.
Now we are hearing it as an unfolding reality.
Therefore it is not a theory anymore.
If we look at the history of civilization we can find out how humans evolved socially and economically to build communities.
The smaller communities turned into big civilizations eventually.
There have been additions and divisions of communities that shaped our current day world as it is.
Since the time when the rule of kings faded and the democracy started to emerge we have been facing a new kind of issue.
That issue is the power and the corruption correlating to the power.
The British Historian Lord Acton has been quoted to have said that all power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.
" This is the issue we have faced for a long time and facing right now.
How would the world become a place where power doesn't trend to corrupt? In my opinion it is not the power that corrupts but the person who has the most power leads the corruption and the people with consecutive levels of power follow in support to the first person.
If all power could be divided equally between all people involved, then the power will not corrupt.
That is because there will not be a single person with power over the others.
When there is no such thing as absolute power there will be no corruption as well.
In our current system the process we practice to allocate power is the election.
It can be a presidential election, a parliamentary election, an election for a particular house or any other entity.
What we do not have is the control over the elected personnel.
Once elected, they are free to do whatever they decide to.
This is the accumulation of power from all the people who voted in a particular election, and then using it with individual decision.
This is what I think is an absolute power.
If we had a system where the decisions of an elected person or elected people could be altered by the people who brought them to power, then the corruption will be less.
So what does New World Order has to do with this power and corruption? The answer is actually very deep but could be explained in a simple manner.
The New World Order is a term that has been depicted mostly as evil than an order.
In fact there are multiple views to this particular term.
It was in the dark a little while ago but is spoken out in the mainstream media now like never before.
Who is looking forward to having a New World Order is another issue.
The governments and business corporations looking forward to a New World Order are actually looking forward for better control system.
They want to have total control of people, processes and most importantly the money.
The financial markets are first and foremost concern in the current day news about New World Order.
Sometimes it involves military power and if you look carefully that comes with an economical background as well.
We can conclude as the current day power results from finances.
If we can bring about a system without trade, then there will be no profit and loss in terms of finances.
If there are no profits and losses, then there would be no business and therefore no finances.
If there are no finances then there will be no economy as such.
If there is no economy to control the powers, then the corruption will be less.
In order to bring about an ideal system like that, first we will have to work out a system where the opinion of every single citizen counts; not just on an election day but in all days.
So the real New World Order should be an order that brings people to power than the finances to power.
We can achieve this if, and only if we can understand this first.
Most of the public opinion is declined towards thinking that the New World Order is an evil thing.
If we can change that mindset from the people and make them understand that the term merely refers to something that is to come, then we might have a chance of setting up our own New World Order.
We can propose our own systems and we can decide which laws we want and which we don't.
It doesn't really matter which country you are from but if you look at the constitution of your country, you will agree to the fact that you do not agree to all the legislation.
If that is the case, why don't we start thinking, deciding and acting to making a New World Order?
Source...