No one can live a life without mistake! Plain and philosophical perspectives would see mistake in a completely different way.
This article will explain the term "mistake" by using both plain and philosophical tactic.
For plain approach, mistake means any act that is not acceptable to the majority of the people who are directly or indirectly affected by the activity committed by the one who is thought to be "mistaken".
Mistake just means unacceptability, because, with or without reasons, this activity is thought to be unacceptable by the majority of people who get or not get involved in.
But when it becomes accepted by the majority of people, it will, with or without reasons, become acceptable.
What about philosophical tactic? In philosophical approach, mistake signifies any commission that is not acceptable, because, with absolute reasons, it would badly affect one or many people or that it does not bring any long-term benefit.
For philosophical view, long-term benefit would be the objective.
Philosophical perspective would not care about majority or inadequate quantity of endorsement, the only reason to prove any activity the mistake just because it is wrong with philosophical reasons.
For philosopher, mistake is still mistake, though only he or she thinks that it is the mistake and other millions of people think that it is acceptable or grandly beneficial.
This article will explain the term "mistake" by using both plain and philosophical tactic.
For plain approach, mistake means any act that is not acceptable to the majority of the people who are directly or indirectly affected by the activity committed by the one who is thought to be "mistaken".
Mistake just means unacceptability, because, with or without reasons, this activity is thought to be unacceptable by the majority of people who get or not get involved in.
But when it becomes accepted by the majority of people, it will, with or without reasons, become acceptable.
What about philosophical tactic? In philosophical approach, mistake signifies any commission that is not acceptable, because, with absolute reasons, it would badly affect one or many people or that it does not bring any long-term benefit.
For philosophical view, long-term benefit would be the objective.
Philosophical perspective would not care about majority or inadequate quantity of endorsement, the only reason to prove any activity the mistake just because it is wrong with philosophical reasons.
For philosopher, mistake is still mistake, though only he or she thinks that it is the mistake and other millions of people think that it is acceptable or grandly beneficial.
Source...